🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," stated the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and fit for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, regulation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and others indicate that governments internationally are no longer content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.